Page 1 of 1
Why not have 1943/44/45
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:54 am
by Coroner47
So they canceled 1943 for pc. Is this the end of the ww2 style of the battlefield series? why not a bf 43, 44 & 45? should they have kept the battles year related? did they blow it in 42? should they have stretched the ww2 series over 3-4 years ( which would b like 6-8 years in release time )??? I was just watching a documentary on tv & thought of this. Maybe we should build 1943, 44 & 45 mods?
Re: Why not have 1943/44/45
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:48 pm
by Iced Earth
Maybe...but build it on BF3. Everything else is too damn old.
Re: Why not have 1943/44/45
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:39 pm
by Jeronimo
You mean UE3? No modding for BF3 that is, if I need to mention at all :/
Re: Why not have 1943/44/45
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:37 pm
by Dennis|8749236
we already have BF1943
but no PC version avaiable, its been cancelled..
(somebody said is because BF3, EA want sell more BF3)
Re: Why not have 1943/44/45
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:37 am
by HJGF
would be nice coro for bf42 right? who knows if bf3 will have mod support
Re: Why not have 1943/44/45
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 4:40 am
by Swaffy
The director of the DICE team said himself that Battlefield 3 is [will be] too advanced to have modding support.
[Edit] That can change, though. Somehow.