Why not have 1943/44/45

Coroner47 · Post by **Coroner47** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:54 am

So they canceled 1943 for pc. Is this the end of the ww2 style of the battlefield series? why not a bf 43, 44 & 45? should they have kept the battles year related? did they blow it in 42? should they have stretched the ww2 series over 3-4 years ( which would b like 6-8 years in release time )??? I was just watching a documentary on tv & thought of this. Maybe we should build 1943, 44 & 45 mods?

Iced Earth · Post by **Iced Earth** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:48 pm

Maybe...but build it on BF3. Everything else is too damn old.

Post by **Jeronimo** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:39 pm

You mean UE3? No modding for BF3 that is, if I need to mention at all :/

Dennis|8749236 · Post by **Dennis|8749236** » Wed Mar 02, 2011 2:37 pm

we already have BF1943

but no PC version avaiable, its been cancelled..
(somebody said is because BF3, EA want sell more BF3)

HJGF · Post by **HJGF** » Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:37 am

would be nice coro for bf42 right? who knows if bf3 will have mod support

Swaffy · Post by **Swaffy** » Tue Mar 22, 2011 4:40 am

The director of the DICE team said himself that Battlefield 3 is [will be] too advanced to have modding support.

[Edit] That can change, though. Somehow.

Battlefield 1942 Mods, Modding Tutorials & Forums

Why not have 1943/44/45

Why not have 1943/44/45

Re: Why not have 1943/44/45

Re: Why not have 1943/44/45

Re: Why not have 1943/44/45

Re: Why not have 1943/44/45

Re: Why not have 1943/44/45